Repository navigation
Expose slots, dtype, len and is_empty on TypedArrayRef - #10406
Performance Regression: -23.78%
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
❌ 5 regressed benchmarks
✅ 2170 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 534 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | density_sweep_dense_runs[0.001] |
30.2 µs | 48.1 µs | -37.24% |
| ❌ | Simulation | filter_powerlaw_by_mostly_true[250000] |
104 µs | 150.4 µs | -30.84% |
| ❌ | Simulation | take[routing/same_chunk/primitive/nonnull/chunks=32/indices=1000] |
176 µs | 222.5 µs | -20.86% |
| ❌ | Simulation | sum_i64 |
194.3 µs | 225.2 µs | -13.73% |
| ❌ | Simulation | sum_v2_i64 |
195.1 µs | 224.8 µs | -13.2% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing rk/typed-array-ref-accessors (7f86522) with develop (88a4de8)
Footnotes
-
534 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩