Repository navigation
feat(layout): compile evals, row indices, and takes to pipelines - #10393
joseph-isaacs wants to merge 6 commits into
Performance Gate Passed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ 15 benchmarks spent significant time in system calls
System calls cannot be consistently instrumented, so they are not included in the measure, which understates the real cost. Please switch to the Walltime instrument to accurately measure system calls.
take[small_m/shuffled/primitive/nonnull/chunks=2048/indices=16]chunked_dict_primitive_into_canonical[f64, (1000, 1000, 10)]optimize_lookup_predicate[ids=256, shape=in_list]zstd_compress_stringmultipolygon_mixed_validityfilter_run_end[len=4096_run=16_density=0.1]density_sweep_dense_runs[0.001]decompress[u32, (1000, 256)]take_varbinpcodec_compress_f64- …and 5 more
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 1 improved benchmark
✅ 2182 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 359 skipped benchmarks1
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | WallTime | bitpack_blocked_compress_avx2 |
7.6 µs | 6.7 µs | +13.68% |
Tip
Curious why performance improved? Comment @codspeedbot explain why performance improved on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing ji/exec-4-eval-row-idx-take-nodes (40e14e8) with ji/exec-3-scan-concat-pack-nodes (a6f9c85)
Footnotes
-
359 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩