Skip to content

Accept DataFusion dynamic filters in VortexSource - #10375

Draft
joseph-isaacs wants to merge 8 commits into
developfrom
ji/df-dynamic-filter-pushdown
Draft

joseph-isaacs wants to merge 8 commits into
developfrom
ji/df-dynamic-filter-pushdown

Prune completed dynamic filters with sparse keys and null rejection

722f10e
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
CodSpeed / CodSpeed Performance Analysis succeeded Oct 9, 2026 in 0s

Performance Gate Passed

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚠️ 1 benchmark measured no execution time

Nothing ran under measurement, usually because the compiler removed the code under test. This result is not comparable, so it counts as unchanged.

Preventing compiler optimizations

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
✅ 2181 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 409 skipped benchmarks1

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
⚡ WallTime bitpack_blocked_compress_avx2 7.6 µs 6.8 µs +11.17%
⚡ WallTime words_gather_dispatch_neon[65536] 2.3 µs 2.1 µs +10.52%
⚠️ Simulation bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 2)] 64.6 µs < 1 ns N/A

Tip

Curious why performance improved? Comment @codspeedbot explain why performance improved on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing ji/df-dynamic-filter-pushdown (722f10e) with develop (1ee4e3a)2

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 409 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

  2. No successful run was found on develop (d451683) during the generation of this report, so 1ee4e3a was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩