Commit Cargo.lock - #126
lukepalmer wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Luke Palmer <luke@lukepalmer.net>
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request stops ignoring ChangesCargo lockfile enforcement
Priority: ⬇️ Low Change: Other Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to The lockfile enforcement change is mergeable after normal checks. No supported build failure or other blocking issue is identified. Security Architecture ReviewSecurity architecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to The change makes builds use committed dependency versions and does not appear to expand application access or build-script authority. The complete locked dependency set has not been independently validated. Retained concerns Security review detailsSecurity Blast Radius
Trust Boundaries and Controls
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Commit Cargo.lock so that we have a deterministic build.
Here is some discussion on why this a good thing to do:
My other motivation is that I would like to make / contribute a nix package for valkey-bloom, and a committed Cargo.lock makes this much cleaner.