Skip to content

Union/merge operator and the unique names assumption #22

Description

@hayesall

Imagine merging to sets of objects with conflicting names.

For example, two people named "alex":

obj1 = RelationalDataset(pos=['a(alex).'], neg=[], facts=['b(alex).', 'c(alex).'])
obj2 = RelationalDataset(pos=['a(alex).'], neg=[], facts=['b(alex).'])

The interpretation is ambiguous, so should probably result in an error/warning:

>>> obj1 | obj2
UniqueNamesAssumptionError: Found 'alex' in `obj1` and `obj2`

If you:

  • know these refer to separate entities
  • know these refer to the same entities

Then there possible ways to handle this:

>>> with DifferentObjects:
...     obj1 | obj2
RelationalDataset(pos=['a(alex1).', 'a(alex2).'], neg=[], facts=['b(alex1).', 'c(alex1).', 'b(alex2).'])
>>> with SameObjects:
...     obj1 | obj2
RelationalDataset(pos=['a(alex).'], neg=[], facts=['b(alex).', 'c(alex).'])

See also:

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions