Skip to content

[PR] Auto-update staggered window cap: 48 hours → 7 days | 自动更新错峰窗口上限 48 小时 → 7 天 - #5427

Open
ranxianglei wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
2026-11-01_stagger-7d
Open

[PR] Auto-update staggered window cap: 48 hours → 7 days | 自动更新错峰窗口上限 48 小时 → 7 天#5427
ranxianglei wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
2026-11-01_stagger-7d

Conversation

@ranxianglei

@ranxianglei ranxianglei commented Nov 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

改什么

自动更新发现新版本后的错峰抽取窗口,上限从 48 小时拉长到 7 天(下限 15 分钟不变)。每台实例仍是在窗口内随机抽一个时刻、落盘持久化、到点再升(#3619),只是摊开范围从 2 天变 7 天,坏发版有更长的中途拦截窗口。

动了两处(必须一起,缺一不生效)

  1. 内置默认 STAGGER_MAX_DELAY_DEFAULT_MS:48 * 3_600_000 → 7 * 86_400_000(src/update-policy.ts)——远程策略文件不可达/未配置时的兜底;
  2. 官方远程策略文件 auto-update-policy.json:default.maxDelay "2d" → "7d"——远程默认优先级高于内置,只改常量的话线上实例实际仍按 2d 走。

兼容性

  • 已抽中的时刻按 (dist-tag, 目标版本) 键落盘,升级到本版不重摇:旧抽取照旧到点执行,只有新发现的版本才在 7 天窗口内抽;
  • 逃逸路径不变:手动 bili update 绕过;staggerMinDelayMs: 0 + staggerMaxDelayMs: 0(或 BILI_UPDATE_STAGGER_MIN_MS/MAX_MS)恢复立即升级;ACP_AUTO_UPDATE=0 全停;
  • 优先级不变:本地 config/env > 远程策略 > 内置;
  • STAGGER_PRUNE_MS(7 天)只清理已过期 7 天以上的旧抽取,不会误删还在等待中的 7 天抽取。

文档与测试

  • README.md / README.zh-CN.md、CONFIGURATION.md / CONFIGURATION.zh-CN.md(默认值、环境变量表、窗口合成说明)同步改为 604800000 / 7 days / 7 天;
  • CHANGELOG Unreleased → Changed;
  • tests/update-policy.test.ts 47/47、knobs-config-precedence 16/16、update-integrity/backoff 等全绿;本机 update-channel.test.ts 2 例失败是本机 verdaccio 镜像配置所致,在纯净 master 上同样失败,与本分支无关;
  • 根 tsc --noEmit 干净。

@ranxianglei ranxianglei changed the title 自动更新错峰窗口上限 48 小时 → 7 天 [PR] Auto-update staggered window cap: 48 hours → 7 days | 自动更新错峰窗口上限 48 小时 → 7 天 Nov 1, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 1, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📦 Built Package Artifact

Branch: 2026-11-01_stagger-7d (cb7cfd3)

Latest build — install this exact version

npm install -g billion-context@0.0.9204-pr.5427.c2b526a

This exact version is immutable and reproducible. The rolling pr tag tracks the newest test build across all PRs.

Recent builds (commit → version)

commit version build
cb7cfd3 billion-context@0.0.9204-pr.5427.c2b526a build
c7271f0 billion-context@0.0.8948-pr.5427.33ca0fb build
cb7bf43 billion-context@0.0.7697-pr.5427.bd94b88 build
b67efee billion-context@0.0.7693-pr.5427.c265336 build
1d4b1ba billion-context@0.0.7690-pr.5427.0a8a329 build

Download artifact

  1. Download the artifact from the Actions run
  2. Extract the tarball and install:
tar xzf billion-context-pr5427.tgz
npm install -g package

Install instructions are refreshed on each push.

@ranxianglei
ranxianglei force-pushed the 2026-11-01_stagger-7d branch from b67efee to cb7bf43 Compare November 1, 2026 09:56
@ranxianglei

ranxianglei commented Nov 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

🤖 Powered by ework · qwen3.8-27b

(ai: vllm-qwen/qwen3.8-27b)

查重: 不重复。检索 open+closed issue/PR 中 stagger 相关项,仅 #4794(updater "Check now" 只查不装)沾边,机制与症状均不同;本 PR 自身即该改动的唯一在途工作。

标签: pr + scope/other + p3(有意行为变更,非缺陷;自更新域不属于 kernel/wiring/storage/ui/ci/docs 任何一类,归 other;影响轻微)。

审核结论(结构化八问)

  1. 是什么问题: 不是缺陷修复,是有意变更——自动更新错峰抽取窗口上限从 48 小时拉长到 7 天(下限 15 分钟不变),让坏发版有更长的中途拦截时间(Automatic staggered rollout: default random upgrade interval of 15 min – 48 h + GitHub remote policy file (emergency kil | 自动升级撒点:默认 15 分钟~48 小时随机升级 + GitHub 远程策略文件(紧急刹车/按版本调速),给事故留响应窗 #3619 机制的参数调整)。
  2. 什么原因导致的: 无缺陷因果链;产品决策。Automatic staggered rollout: default random upgrade interval of 15 min – 48 h + GitHub remote policy file (emergency kil | 自动升级撒点:默认 15 分钟~48 小时随机升级 + GitHub 远程策略文件(紧急刹车/按版本调速),给事故留响应窗 #3619 的抽取/落盘/到点升级机制本身工作正常,只动窗口参数,且按设计必须两处同改(内置常量 + 官方远程策略文件),本 PR 两处都改了,方向正确。
  3. 影响范围与严重程度: 所有走自动更新、未设本地覆盖的实例——发现新版本后最坏等待从 ≤48h 变 ≤7d(均值约 24h→约 3.5d)。已落盘的旧抽取不受影响(按 dist-tag+目标版本键控,不重摇)。逃逸路径不变(手动 bili update / min0+max0 / ACP_AUTO_UPDATE=0)。属体验级有意变更,无功能损伤。
  4. 怎么修复的: STAGGER_MAX_DELAY_DEFAULT_MS 172800000→604800000(src/update-policy.ts)+ auto-update-policy.json default.maxDelay "2d"→"7d",优先级链(本地 config/env > 远程策略 > 内置)不动,文档四件套与测试同步。审核中发现一个真问题: 首提交 1d4b1ba 手改了 CONFIGURATION.md/.zh-CN.md 里由 website/config-reference/*.yaml 生成的表格块,却没改种子——CI 的 docs-sync job(重新 generate + git diff --exit-code)必红;我在 PR head 上复现了该红(生成器把 4 行翻回 48h)。作者随后已自行补上 b67efee("docs: stagger-7d table rows come from the config-reference seed"),我独立验证过:从新种子重新生成,输出与 PR 提交的文档文本逐字节一致,漂移消除。
  5. 是否有回归问题: 逐项清点既有行为——① prune 语义: STAGGER_PRUNE_MS(7d)只删已过期超过 7 天的旧抽取(src/update-policy.ts:428 now - draws[k] > STAGGER_PRUNE_MS),新窗口内尚在等待的抽取 delta 为负、永不误删 ✓;② 落盘/重摇语义不变(earliest-draw-wins Math.min,键含版本);③ 逃逸路径与优先级链不变;④ 未触碰 wire/配置 schema/持久化格式/kernel/;⑤ 残留 "48h" 引用仅剩 src/duration.ts 文档注释示例(通用时长格式,正确)与 CHANGELOG 历史条目(应保留)。未发现回归。
  6. 是否破坏缓存: 不涉及(不触碰压缩/缓存路径)。
  7. 是否改了设计方向: 不涉及——机制原样,仅默认窗口参数放宽。
  8. 是否引入了新的配置: 不涉及——无新 key/env,仅默认值变化。

行为变更披露(强制): 默认错峰窗口上限 48h → 7d(旧值 172800000ms / 远程 "2d",新值 604800000ms / "7d",内置与远程策略同步);原因:坏发版拦截窗口拉长;代价:新版本最坏落地时间从 2 天变 7 天——issue 正文已明示为 owner 意图,此处正式记录 old→new。

验证证据: 本地(新 head b67efee 等价树)定向跑 tests/update-policy.test.ts + tests/knobs-config-precedence.test.ts = 63/63 绿,tsc --noEmit 干净,generate 幂等。作者提到的 update-channel.test.ts 本机 2 例失败系本机 verdaccio 镜像环境所致(纯净 master 同样失败),与本分支无关;全量判定以 CI 为准。

CI 状态(写此回复时): 新 head b67efee 的 run 刚入队(docs-sync 等全部 queued,fetched_at 09:50Z);mergeable_state=behind(master 前移,非阻塞)。

收工判定: 方向正确、实现闭环(两处常量 + 种子 + 文档 + 测试齐整)、审核发现的唯一实质问题(seed 漂移)已由作者跟进提交修复并经我独立验证消除;预期 CI 转绿后即可合并(合并由人工执行)。

This was referenced Nov 1, 2026
Open
Merged
Closed
Open
@ranxianglei
ranxianglei force-pushed the 2026-11-01_stagger-7d branch from cb7bf43 to c7271f0 Compare November 10, 2026 14:14
@ranxianglei

ranxianglei commented Nov 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

🤖 Powered by ework · qwen3.8-27b

(ai: opencode/qwen3.8-27b)

Conflict rebase complete — PR #5427 is mergeable again.

What I did this run:

  1. Rebased 2026-11-01_stagger-7d onto master. Master moved while I worked (it advanced 2454 commits past my initial base mid-run), so the final base is the live master tip 58a87962. Both rebase passes together produced the pushed head c7271f09.
  2. Resolved every conflict in commit 1 (all caused by master relocating the config docs from root CONFIGURATION.md to docs/configuration.md after the PR was cut):
    • Root CONFIGURATION.md / .zh-CN.md → kept master's redirect stubs (the real content now lives in docs/).
    • docs/configuration.md + .zh-CN.md → ported the PR's 7 stagger-default edits each to the new location (table rows, autoUpdate prose, update section Default/window-composition/Staggered-rollout text, env table + env description).
    • README.md / .zh-CN.md → union resolution: "15 min – 7 days" wording plus master's new docs/configuration*.md#update link.
    • CHANGELOG.md → kept master's grown [Unreleased] block intact, inserted the PR's entry at the top of the first Changed section.
  3. Commit 2 (website/config-reference/updates.yaml seed) applied clean; ran node tools/gen-config-docs.mjs generate afterwards → zero diff, i18n parity ok — the hand-edited table rows are byte-identical to the seed-derived output, so the docs-sync lane stays green.
  4. Three small labeled follow-up fixes (own commits, same mechanism — stale 48 h wording the PR couldn't have seen at its base):
  5. Verified: npm run typecheck clean; targeted tests/update-policy.test.ts 47/47 pass locally; final branch diff vs master is exactly the PR's intended footprint (12 files, 32+/32−, nothing else). Deliberately left untouched: log-retention's unrelated 48 h target, src/duration.ts's generic duration examples, and the historical Automatic staggered rollout: default random upgrade interval of 15 min – 48 h + GitHub remote policy file (emergency kil | 自动升级撒点:默认 15 分钟~48 小时随机升级 + GitHub 远程策略文件(紧急刹车/按版本调速),给事故留响应窗 #3619 CHANGELOG entry.
  6. Pushed (force-with-lease against the exact pre-push head) and confirmed live: mergeable: true, mergeable_state: blocked (CI running on the new head + human-only merge — no conflict remains). Full-suite verdict rides on the remote CI lanes on c7271f09; the mirror check-cache I read was a stale Nov-1 snapshot, so per-check results will land as the poller refreshes.

No behavior change was introduced by the rebase itself: the code delta vs master is byte-for-byte the PR's own (constant STAGGER_MAX_DELAY_DEFAULT_MS 48 h → 7 days + comments + docs); my extra commits touch documentation/comments only.

中文八问

  1. 是什么问题:PR 分支与 master 文本冲突(merge state dirty),无法合并。
  2. 什么原因导致的:PR(11-01)创建后,master 把配置文档从根目录 CONFIGURATION.md 迁到 docs/configuration.md(owner 指令 2026-11-08)、README 链接改指 docs/、CHANGELOG [Unreleased] 大幅增长——PR 的原始 diff 全部落在旧位置上,产生冲突;属文档搬家型冲突,非代码分歧。
  3. 影响范围与严重程度:仅该 PR 自身的可合并性;修复前无法合并,修复后恢复。无任何运行时行为影响。
  4. 怎么修复的:rebase 到当前 master(期间 master 又前进 2454 个提交,二次 rebase 到最新 tip 58a87962);冲突按「保留 master 结构 + 把 PR 内容移植到新位置」逐处解决;用 gen-config-docs generate 验证重生成零 diff;顺手修掉 3 处 PR 基线之后才出现的旧 48h 表述(JA README、lifecycle 表、测试文件头注释)。
  5. 是否有回归问题:无。代码文件(src/update-policy.ts、knobs.ts、测试、policy json)自动合并零冲突,与 master 的 diff 只有 PR 本意的常量与注释改动;typecheck 干净;定向测试 47/47 通过;未触碰日志保留的 48h 目标、duration 通用示例、历史 CHANGELOG 条目等无关内容。
  6. 是否破坏缓存:不涉及(未触碰任何缓存/重试/游标/去重逻辑)。
  7. 是否改了设计方向:否。
  8. 是否引入了新的配置:rebase 本身未引入新配置。行为变更披露:PR 自身的目的变更 = 自动更新错峰窗口内置默认上限 48 小时 → 7 天(old→new,PR 描述已声明),rebase 原样保留,未新增漂移。

收工判定:冲突已全部解决并推送(c7271f09,base = 当前 master tip),live 状态 mergeable=true;剩 CI 在新 head 上跑绿 + 人工合并,agent 不代合。

@ranxianglei

ranxianglei commented Nov 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

🤖 Powered by ework · qwen3.8-27b

[bot]
(ai: opencode/qwen3.8-27b)

Rebase 后终审完成(head c7271f09,base = master tip 58a87962)——可合并。 本次对冲突解决后的新 head 独立重审:逐行读了 12 文件全量 diff、在 PR head worktree 里重跑文档生成器验证零漂移、定向跑测试 63/63 绿、grep 全树确认无残留旧值引用。CI 30/30 绿(0 failed / 0 pending,fetched 14:34Z),mergeable_state=blocked 仅因人工合并门禁。

结构化八问

  1. 是什么问题:不是缺陷修复,是有意行为变更——自动更新错峰抽取窗口上限从 48 小时拉长到 7 天(下限 15 分钟不变),给坏发版更长的中途拦截时间(Automatic staggered rollout: default random upgrade interval of 15 min – 48 h + GitHub remote policy file (emergency kil | 自动升级撒点:默认 15 分钟~48 小时随机升级 + GitHub 远程策略文件(紧急刹车/按版本调速),给事故留响应窗 #3619 机制的参数调整)。
  2. 什么原因导致的:无缺陷因果链;产品决策。按设计必须两处同改(内置常量 + 官方远程策略文件,远程默认优先级高于内置),本 PR 两处都改了:STAGGER_MAX_DELAY_DEFAULT_MS 172800000→604800000(src/update-policy.ts:51)+ auto-update-policy.json default.maxDelay "2d"→"7d"。方向正确。
  3. 影响范围与严重程度:所有走自动更新且未设本地覆盖的实例——发现新版本后最坏等待 ≤48h → ≤7d(均值约 24h → 约 3.5d)。已落盘旧抽取按 (dist-tag, 版本) 键控不重摇,照旧到点执行。逃逸路径不变(手动 bili update / min0+max0 / ACP_AUTO_UPDATE=0)。体验级有意变更,无功能损伤。
  4. 怎么修复的:常量 + 远程策略文件同步改宽;优先级链(本地 config/env > 远程策略 > 内置)、落盘/不重摇(prune 只删已过期超 7 天的抽取,src/update-policy.ts:428 now - draws[k] > STAGGER_PRUNE_MS,等待中抽取 delta 为负永不误删)、earliest-draw-wins(Math.min,src/update-policy.ts:426)全部原样未动;文档四件套 + JA README + lifecycle 表 + config-reference 种子 + 测试注释同步。
  5. 是否有回归问题:逐项清点——① prune 语义 ✓(见上);② 落盘键控/重摇语义 ✓ 不变;③ 优先级链 ✓ 不变(resolveStaggerWindow 仅注释改动);④ typo guard(拒绝 >1 年延迟)✓ 7d 远低于上限;⑤ 未触碰 wire/配置 schema/持久化格式/kernel/;⑥ 生成器幂等 ✓(PR head 上 gen-config-docs generate 零 diff,en/zh 表行与种子逐字节一致);⑦ 全树 grep 确认 stagger 域内无残留 "48 h"/"172800000"/"2d" 引用——仅剩的 48h 都是无关域(log-retention 保留目标、duration 通用示例、时长解析器测试向量),正确未动。未发现回归。
  6. 是否破坏缓存:不涉及。
  7. 是否改了设计方向:不涉及——机制原样,仅默认窗口参数放宽。
  8. 是否引入了新的配置:不涉及——无新 key/env,仅默认值变化。

行为变更披露(强制):默认错峰窗口上限 48h → 7d(内置 172800000ms→604800000ms,远程策略 "2d"→"7d");原因:坏发版拦截窗口拉长;代价:新版本最坏落地 2 天→7 天。issue 正文已明示为 owner 意图,此处正式记录 old→new。

测试有效性:tests/update-policy.test.ts 显式钉死两个常量(assert.equal(STAGGER_MAX_DELAY_DEFAULT_MS, 7 * 86_400_000)),外加均匀性/持久化不重摇/优先级/fail-open/安全边界全套——常量被改回 48h 时必红,断言有牙。本地定向 63/63 绿(update-policy 47 + knobs-config-precedence 16);全量判定以 CI 为准,已 30/30 绿。

收工判定:实现闭环、无回归、CI 全绿、diff 干净(12 文件 32+/32−,每行都服务于本 PR 目的)——可合并,合并由人工执行。

ranxianglei and others added 5 commits November 12, 2026 05:59
@ranxianglei ci-check
chore: auto-update stagger window stretches 48 h -> 7 days
7f930f3 
The rollout-spread window draws ONE random moment per machine inside
[minDelay, maxDelay]. 48 h left only two days of spread; a bad release
was effectively fleet-wide by the time Monday came around. Both places
that define the default change together:

- built-in STAGGER_MAX_DELAY_DEFAULT_MS 48 h -> 7 days (the fallback
  when the remote policy file is unreachable/unset);
- the official remote policy file auto-update-policy.json
  default.maxDelay 2d -> 7d (remote default outranks the built-in, so
  the constant alone would be inert).

Persisted draws are keyed by (dist-tag, target version), so upgrading
to this version does NOT re-roll an already-drawn moment — old draws
fire as drawn; only newly discovered versions draw inside 7 days.
Escapes unchanged: manual 'bili update', zeroed stagger bounds, or
ACP_AUTO_UPDATE=0. Precedence unchanged: local config/env > remote
policy > built-in.

Docs: README/README.zh-CN, CONFIGURATION/CONFIGURATION.zh-CN (defaults,
env tables, window-composition notes) updated to 604800000 / 7 days.
@ranxianglei ci-check
docs: stagger-7d table rows come from the config-reference seed
a5a329c 
docs-sync regenerates CONFIGURATION*.md from website/config-reference/
*.yaml; hand-edited table rows drift. Move the 7-day default + examples
into updates.yaml and regenerate (output identical to the hand edits).
ci-check
docs: sync stagger-default wording in post-base files (README.ja, lif…
b133a92 
…ecycle table)

The rebase onto current master picks up two files added after this PR's base (community JA README #6000, docs/lifecycle.md env table) that still state the old 48 h built-in cap; align them with the 7-day default like every other surface.
ci-check
docs: update stale coverage-map comment in update-policy test (48h ->…
e2fb4d2 
… 7d)

The assertion below already pins STAGGER_MAX_DELAY_DEFAULT_MS == 7 * 86_400_000; the header coverage map still described the old 48 h default.
ci-check
chore: restore blank line before second Fixed heading dropped by conf…
cb7cfd3 
…lict resolution
@ranxianglei
ranxianglei force-pushed the 2026-11-01_stagger-7d branch from c7271f0 to cb7cfd3 Compare November 11, 2026 22:48
@ranxianglei

ranxianglei commented Nov 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

🤖 Powered by ework · qwen3.8-27b

[bot] 🏷 (ai: opencode/qwen3.8-27b)

Conflict re-resolved after master moved again — PR #5427 is back to mergeable.

What happened this run (all verified live, not from memory):

  1. Master moved twice since my last push: 58a8796 → 33104b1 (#6150 compress-at-fold-point removal) → c26c31a (#6260 handoff web-render upgrade). Both landed fresh entries at the top of the CHANGELOG [Unreleased] section — the exact spot this PR also writes — so the PR was flagged dirty again.
  2. Re-rebased onto the live master tip c26c31a. Only CHANGELOG.md conflicted (master's new handoff entry vs the PR entry at the top of the first ### Changed); resolved as a union keeping BOTH entries (PR entry first, same order as last time). All other files auto-merged cleanly.
  3. Fixed a leftover artifact from the previous rebase: a blank line before the second ### Fixed heading in CHANGELOG.md had been silently dropped during the first conflict resolution. Restored in its own labeled commit so the final diff vs master contains nothing but the PR's intended change.
  4. Verified before pushing: final diff vs master = exactly the intended 12-file footprint (stagger 48h→7d + docs); tools/gen-config-docs.mjs generate zero-diff (339 seeds, 254 i18n keys); residue scan for stale 48h values clean (only remaining hits are the unrelated log-retention feature and generic duration-string examples); npm run typecheck clean; targeted tests/update-policy.test.ts 47/47 pass.
  5. Pushed with --force-with-lease pinned to the verified prior head (remote head was untouched by anyone else) → new head cb7cfd3 on base c26c31a.
  6. Live state after push (single read-only API check): mergeable: true, mergeable_state: blocked — i.e. no more conflict; blocked only by pending CI on the new head plus human-only merge. Mirror cache at read time showed 30 checks / 0 failed, which predates this push; CI will re-run on the new head.

No design decisions were needed and none are requested. The code delta is byte-for-byte the PR author's own 48h → 7d default change — the rebase introduces no behavioral drift. Remaining step is yours: merge when CI is green.

中文八问（供审核）

  1. 是什么问题：PR 分支在上一轮落地后，master 又先后合入 [PR] remove: the experimental compressAtFoldPoint feature — fold-point relocation (v1 #5471 + unreleased v2 #5949), #6132 #6150（fold-point 移除）和 [PR] Web Panel: Handoff Documentation and Collapsed Tree Diagram Rendering Upgrade (eWork-Level Rendering, Appendix Sectionin | Web 面板：交接文档与压缩树图渲染升级（eWork 级渲染、附录分节、冻结快照水合） #6260（handoff 渲染升级），两者都在 CHANGELOG [Unreleased] 顶部新增条目，与本 PR 的写入位置重叠，系统再次把 PR 标为冲突。
  2. 什么原因导致的：master 持续前进且新条目恰好落在本 PR 唯一共享的热区（CHANGELOG Unreleased 头部）；不是 PR 自身内容有问题。
  3. 影响范围与严重程度：仅影响本 PR 的可合并性（dirty 挡住合并），不影响任何用户可见行为；属于调度阻塞级，无外部影响。
  4. 怎么修复的：rebase 到最新 master tip c26c31a；CHANGELOG 唯一冲突按并集解决（双方条目都保留，PR 条目居上）；顺手补回上一轮冲突解决时误丢的一个空行（独立标注 commit）；force-with-lease 推送（推送前已验证远端 head 未被他人改动）。
  5. 是否有回归问题：无。最终树与 master 逐文件比对 = 仅 PR 自身的 12 个文件改动；生成器零漂移；typecheck 干净；update-policy 定向测试 47/47；高危模式逐项过——无语义漂移、无阈值/时序/输出格式变化（除 PR 本意的 48h→7d）、无 fail-fast 变吞错。
  6. 是否破坏缓存：不涉及（未触碰缓存、重试、增量游标逻辑）。
  7. 是否改了设计方向：不涉及。
  8. 是否引入了新的配置：不涉及（本 PR 本身只改内置默认值 48h→7 天，系 PR 作者原意；现有逃生阀 BILI_UPDATE_STAGGER_MAX_DELAY_MS 等配置面未动）。

收工判定：冲突已解，PR 恢复可合并（仅剩 CI 待跑 + 人工合并），等待 owner 合并。

@ranxianglei

ranxianglei commented Nov 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

🤖 Powered by ework · qwen3.8-27b

[bot] 🏷 (ai: opencode/qwen3.8-27b)

Stale trigger — no action was needed this run. Verified live just now:

  • This "merge state: dirty" flag predates my last push (~07:00). Checked against the live sources in this run:
    • Remote PR head = cb7cfd32be (untouched by anyone else); it already contains the current master tip c26c31ace4 — zero commits behind, so no conflict can exist.
    • Mirror check cache (fetched 07:09, sha-pinned to cb7cfd32be): 30 checks, 0 failed, 0 pending — all test shards (ubuntu/windows × node 22/24), static-gates, kernel-guard, gate, config-surface-guard: success; gated e2e lanes skipped as designed.
    • Single read-only GitHub check: state: open, mergeable: true, mergeable_state: blocked — with CI fully green, the remaining blocker is human-only merge policy, not a technical one.
  • Nothing was pushed or changed this run (nothing to change). The PR is ready for you to merge whenever.

中文八问（供审核）

  1. 是什么问题：系统再次转发「PR 冲突」告警，但属过期检测——告警基于我上一轮推送（07:00）之前的旧状态。
  2. 什么原因导致的：阻塞检测器读取的是推送前的缓存快照；推送后 PR 已恢复可合并，但新一轮告警仍按旧状态触发。
  3. 影响范围与严重程度：无实际影响——纯误报级；分支、代码、CI 均正常。
  4. 怎么修复的：无需修复。本轮只做活体验证：远端 head 未被他人改动、已包含当前 master tip（落后 0 提交）、镜像缓存按 sha 钉死确认 30 项检查全绿、单次只读 API 确认 mergeable=true。
  5. 是否有回归问题：不涉及（本轮零改动）。
  6. 是否破坏缓存：不涉及。
  7. 是否改了设计方向：不涉及。
  8. 是否引入了新的配置：不涉及。

收工判定：冲突不存在（过期告警），CI 全绿，PR 仅剩人工合并一步，等待 owner。

@BBleae BBleae mentioned this pull request Nov 11, 2026
Open

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

p3 scope/other 稍后统一看

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@ranxianglei