Skip to content

6510 - Sync data source delete between clients - #6556

Merged
mergify[bot] merged 1 commit into
6510-skip-sender-socket-messagefrom
6510-data-sources-delete-sync
Oct 28, 2026
Merged

mergify[bot] merged 1 commit into
6510-skip-sender-socket-messagefrom
6510-data-sources-delete-sync

Conversation

@sorja

@sorja sorja commented Oct 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@sorja
sorja marked this pull request as ready for review October 28, 2026 08:00
@sorja
sorja requested a review from minotogna as a code owner October 28, 2026 08:00
@mergify mergify Bot added the queued label Oct 28, 2026
@mergify
mergify Bot merged commit 42984f1 into 6510-skip-sender-socket-message Oct 28, 2026
5 checks passed
@mergify
mergify Bot deleted the 6510-data-sources-delete-sync branch October 28, 2026 08:02
@mergify

mergify Bot commented Oct 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✅ Merged into 6510-skip-sender-socket-message as 42984f1 at 08:02 UTC

Less than a minute in the queue, with no time running CI.

So far

  • ✅ Entered the queue Wed 28 Oct, 08:02 · rule default · triggered by rule Automatic merge using squash
  • ✅ Checks skipped · PR is already up-to-date
  • ✅ Merged 08:02 · 42984f1 · squash
Merge conditions: 1 of 1 met

This pull request

Condition
✅ #approved-reviews-by>=1

Times in UTC · dashboard · how the merge queue works

@mergify mergify Bot removed the queued label Oct 28, 2026
mergify Bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2026
* 6510 - Description socket (#6550)

* 6510 - Data socket (#6552)

* 6510 - Data socket

* 6510 - Fix displayed value in E2E

---------

Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* 6510 - Sync data source delete between clients (#6556)

---------

Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants