Skip to content

[ci] E: Update nanvix workflow refs to v3.0.6 - #366

Merged
ppenna merged 1 commit into
nanvix/v3.49.0from
automation/update-nanvix-workflows
Sep 9, 2026
Merged

ppenna merged 1 commit into
nanvix/v3.49.0from
automation/update-nanvix-workflows

Conversation

@ppenna

@ppenna ppenna commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Automated bump of nanvix/workflows references to v3.0.6.

Generated by the Update Workflow Refs workflow.

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings September 8, 2026 14:49
@ppenna ppenna self-assigned this Sep 8, 2026

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot review overview

🟢 Approval recommended

The change is a straightforward reusable-workflow version bump with no other logic or configuration modifications.

Review tier: Lite
Findings: None

What changed in this PR

This PR updates the repository’s Nanvix CI GitHub Actions workflow to use nanvix/workflows reusable workflow version v3.0.6, keeping CI aligned with the latest shared workflow release.

Changes:

  • Bump nanvix/workflows/.github/workflows/nanvix-ci.yml references from v3.0.5 to v3.0.6 for both the regular and scheduled CI jobs.
File Description
.github/​workflows/​nanvix-ci.yml Updates the reusable workflow reference to nanvix/workflows@v3.0.6 for both CI job variants.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@ppenna
ppenna force-pushed the automation/update-nanvix-workflows branch from b5d3573 to ac23747 Compare September 9, 2026 14:08
@ppenna
ppenna merged commit 4e0d20a into nanvix/v3.49.0 Sep 9, 2026
13 checks passed
@ppenna
ppenna deleted the automation/update-nanvix-workflows branch September 9, 2026 14:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants