Skip to content

[ci] E: Update Nanvix SDK - #889

Merged
ppenna merged 1 commit into
nanvix/v3.12.3from
automation/update-nanvix-version
Aug 19, 2026
Merged

ppenna merged 1 commit into
nanvix/v3.12.3from
automation/update-nanvix-version

Conversation

@ppenna

@ppenna ppenna commented Aug 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Automated coherent update to verified Nanvix SDK v0.23.43-sdk.1. The manifest and lockfile were generated atomically by the target zutils implementation.

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 19, 2026 13:52

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the Nanvix SDK version pin used by CPython’s Nanvix build configuration, keeping the manifest and generated lockfile in sync for v0.23.43-sdk.1.

Changes:

  • Bump nanvix-version from 0.23.41 to 0.23.43 in the Nanvix manifest.
  • Update the pinned SDK image version/digest to v0.23.43-sdk.1 / sha256:faaf....
  • Regenerate nanvix.lock to reflect the new SDK metadata (commit, asset URLs/ids, dependency version strings).
Show a summary per file
File Description
.nanvix/nanvix.toml Updates the Nanvix SDK version and container digest pin used for builds.
.nanvix/nanvix.lock Regenerated lockfile reflecting the updated SDK version, digest, and resolved artifacts.

Review details

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

  • Files reviewed: 1/2 changed files
  • Comments generated: 0
  • Review effort level: Lite

@ppenna
ppenna merged commit d63f714 into nanvix/v3.12.3 Aug 19, 2026
13 of 14 checks passed
@ppenna
ppenna deleted the automation/update-nanvix-version branch August 19, 2026 14:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants