Skip to content

README: restructure like the larger decision-model repos; zh-CN README, CITATION.cff, logo, social preview - #9

Merged
lawrence3699 merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
readme/high-star-restructure
Nov 4, 2026
Merged

lawrence3699 merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
readme/high-star-restructure

Conversation

@lawrence3699

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Docs only. Nothing in the runtime, dependencies or pinned model revisions changes.

Why

The repository page is the whole product page: in the last 14 days, 95 of 99 unique visitors looked at the overview and almost nobody opened a second file. The README opened with two paragraphs of guide links and three paragraphs on identity, training sources and service status before any install command, and the reasons to use the project were 230 lines down. The highest-starred repositories in this space (jaredpalmer/kev, ollaya-dev/ollaya, NandhaKishorM/laya, nokia-applied-research/AnyJev, Valen-Team/Valen) all open with a one-line pitch, a link row, an install command and a visible result, then highlights, a model table with a recommendation, a comparison table, how it works, limitations, a roadmap and a citation.

What changes

  • Centered header: logo, one-line pitch, link row (website, models, demo, PyPI, skills, MCP, changelog, 简体中文), badges, maintainer line.
  • Order: quick start, why Jev-Style, models (one table + recommendation; the Laya comparison and the per-build sizes fold into <details>), where it fits (new comparison with hosted Jev, Kev and Laya, cells taken from their READMEs on 2026-11-03), Python / shell / curl examples, agent skills, guard, MCP, eval, recipes, cascades, backends and speed, API, how it works (new, from the model cards), limitations (new; the BANKING77 TF–IDF result and every other caveat now live here instead of inside Quick start), used by and mentioned in (vLLM Semantic Router blog, eullm, Hub library integration, awesome lists, MCP Registry), roadmap, repository layout, contributing, citation, about the project.
  • The identity, training-source and service-status paragraphs move to "About the project" at the end. Every statement is kept, including the bold Jev 1.14 distillation disclosure, the local-vs-hosted distinction and the health-endpoint note. The guide links with their UTM parameters are kept. The <!-- mcp-name --> line stays (tests/test_server_json.py passes).
  • README.zh-CN.md: a Chinese summary that points to the English README as canonical.
  • CITATION.cff: enables GitHub's "Cite this repository" button.
  • docs/assets/logo.svg, logo-dark.svg (the ring-and-tail mark from the site's social card) and docs/assets/social-preview.png (the site's 1200×630 card, for Settings → Social preview; GitHub does not expose that setting through the API).
  • CHANGELOG: an Unreleased entry.

To review before merging

  • The three unchecked roadmap items (fine-tune on your own labels, images in the MLX build, listings in more runners) are proposals, not commitments. Edit or remove.
  • The logo and social-preview images are referenced by raw URLs on main, as the banner and GIF already are, so they render after the merge, not in this PR's preview.
  • The comparison table describes Kev and Laya from their READMEs; please sanity-check the cells.

Checks

  • pytest -q: 233 passed.
  • uv build + twine check --strict: PASSED (the README is the PyPI long description).
  • GitHub's Markdown API renders the README with the <picture> header and the four <details> blocks intact; every in-page anchor resolves; every new external link returns 200.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

lawrence3699 and others added 3 commits November 3, 2026 11:03
…EADME, CITATION.cff, logo and social preview

Quick start and the reasons to use it come first, then one model table with a recommendation, a comparison with
hosted Jev, Kev and Laya, the agent tooling, and new sections: how it works, limitations, used by and mentioned in,
roadmap, citation. The identity, training-source and service-status statements move to "About the project" at the
end, unchanged in substance. The mcp-name line stays. Docs only: no runtime, dependency or model-revision change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Port the content changes of #10 (fix/audit-0.6.4) into the restructured
README so that, once #10 is merged, README.md can be resolved by taking
this branch's version:

- Decision Index 0.3: the public board entry (2026-11-04, jev-style-2b-v4:
  Public 44.37, Full 34.53, Breadth 41.75; Vision 57.55 / 51.94; 0.8B v3
  17.0 / 12.5) replaces the self-run wording, with one line on Public vs
  Full. The outdated 2B v4 banner is no longer shown.
- Hosted API section: jev-style-2b-decision-v4, text only, 8,192-token
  context, 8,000-token inputs, no fixed per-account quota, 429 with
  Retry-After, 413 input_too_large vs the local 400 max_tokens_exceeded.
- Install commands carry the [torch] / [mlx] extras (also in the
  comparison table); the bare install and the mlx-lm 0.31.3 pin are
  explained.
- noul / choice examples (team routing, refund, phishing, topic, tool
  choice) in place of the urgency and frustration score examples.
- Key rule, both error-body shapes, Host / Origin check, download and
  --verify integrity checks, guard "200 without usable answers is ask",
  guard numbers measured with the 0.8B v3, MCP instructions, llama.cpp
  download-first steps, Discussions and SECURITY.md.

Review fixes: Models link and WEIGHTS badge point at the Hub profile
(the v4 collection has no 0.8B); Kev's smallest download is Kev-0.8B;
"Train on your own labels" is "no"; the roadmap is marked as ideas with
no dates and its open items as proposals; the Hub library line names the
main (PyTorch) model pages; "Used by" keeps only entries that could be
checked. README.zh-CN.md gets the same changes; CITATION.cff is 0.6.4.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
README.md: this branch's version (it already carries the 0.6.4 content).
CHANGELOG.md: both entries, Unreleased above 0.6.4.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@lawrence3699
lawrence3699 marked this pull request as ready for review November 4, 2026 22:04
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings November 4, 2026 22:04
@lawrence3699
lawrence3699 merged commit 08031b0 into main Nov 4, 2026
8 checks passed
@lawrence3699
lawrence3699 deleted the readme/high-star-restructure branch November 4, 2026 22:04

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota. Try requesting a review at a lower effort level.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants