Skip to content

docs: correct star history chart repository links#325

Open
Mohit-001-hash wants to merge 1 commit into
geturbackend:mainfrom
Mohit-001-hash:docs/fix-star-history-link
Open

docs: correct star history chart repository links#325
Mohit-001-hash wants to merge 1 commit into
geturbackend:mainfrom
Mohit-001-hash:docs/fix-star-history-link

Conversation

@Mohit-001-hash

@Mohit-001-hash Mohit-001-hash commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚀 Pull Request Description

Fixes # 325

This PR fixes the Star History chart URLs in the README.md. Previously, the links and image sources pointed to the geturbackend/urbackend namespace, which is incorrect and causes the chart to break or display data for the wrong repository. I have updated the repos parameter in all relevant anchor and image tags to point to the correct namespace: yash-pouranik/urbackend, ensuring the chart accurately reflects this repository's growth.

🛠️ Type of Change

  • 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • 📝 Documentation update
  • 🎨 UI/UX improvement (Frontend only)
  • ⚙️ Refactor / Chore

🧪 Testing & Validation

Backend Verification:

  • I have run npm test in the backend/ directory and all tests passed.
  • I have verified the API endpoints using Postman/Thunder Client.
  • New unit tests have been added (if applicable).
    (Note: N/A — Documentation update only)

Frontend Verification:

  • I have run npm run lint in the frontend/ directory.
  • Verified the UI changes on different screen sizes (Responsive).
  • Checked for any console errors in the browser dev tools.
    (Note: N/A — Documentation update only)

📸 Screenshots / Recordings (Optional)

Not applicable. This is a README formatting update.

✅ Checklist

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • My changes generate no new warnings or errors.
  • I have updated the documentation (README/Docs) accordingly.

Built with ❤️ for urBackend.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated repository references and links in the project README file.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 53e4a94d-e0f9-46df-b4b0-5fdb6acdfee5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9ccebb3 and 677256f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The "Star History" embed section in README.md was updated to reference the yash-pouranik/urbackend repository instead of the previous geturbackend/urbackend repository. Only the embed URLs and image source links were changed; the section structure is unchanged.

Changes

README Star History URL Update

Layer / File(s) Summary
Star History embed URL change
README.md
Replaces geturbackend/urbackend with yash-pouranik/urbackend in the Star History anchor link and <picture>/<source> image URLs (lines 275–279).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐇 A little hop, a URL swap,
The star chart now points to a new stop.
Four lines changed, no logic to chase,
Just a repo link moved to its place.
This bunny approves — now off I hop! 🌟

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'docs: correct star history chart repository links' accurately describes the main change: updating Star History chart links in README.md from an incorrect to correct repository namespace.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant