cmd/bbolt: reject overflowing page-item indexes#1204
Open
immanuwell wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: immanuwell The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: immanuwell <pchpr.00@list.ru>
8a6093a to
93cfe7d
Compare
Member
|
/ok-to-test |
Member
|
@immanuwell thanks for your contribution Would you kindly share logs from the repro scenario above ? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
page-itemtakes itemid as uint64 but then casts it to uint16. So65536wraps to0and prints the first item. tiny CLI footgun, but pretty real.Repro:
Before: succeeds and prints item 0, kinda yikes.
After: returns an itemid range error before reading the page.
Added a regression test for the wraparound case.
Tests:
go test ./...still hits local failpoint setup failures here (failpoint: failpoint does not exist), unrelated to this change.