Skip to content

feat(capability): define Discord image generation and asset storage flow #201

Description

@egdev6

Pre-flight checks

  • I searched existing issues and this is not a duplicate
  • I understand this issue must be approved before implementation starts
  • I will not include real Discord IDs, tokens, credentials, screenshots, raw logs, transcripts, or private payloads in public evidence

Problem

The user wants image creation from Discord with filesystem access. OpenClaw has several media/model provider plugins and ClawHub image candidates, but the project needs a workflow for prompts, approvals, output storage, provenance, and private filesystem boundaries.

Proposed solution

Define a Discord image generation capability and workflow. Select candidate providers/plugins, define where generated assets are stored, require scoped filesystem permission for saving outside the workspace, and pair with a skill for brief → draft → review → approved asset.

Area

Runtime

Acceptance criteria

  • Candidate image generation providers/plugins are documented and verified in the current runtime or via ClawHub search.
  • Asset storage target is classified as repo-backed, private runtime, or local filesystem.
  • Filesystem writes require explicit scope permission and approval.
  • Generated asset metadata includes prompt summary, provider, timestamp, and intended use.
  • Fake-first flow avoids real private images and account data.
  • Discord response previews are bounded and safe.

Validation plan

  • Validate provider/plugin availability without generating private assets.
  • Use demo prompts and fake metadata fixtures.
  • Confirm no file write happens before approval.

Additional context

Bundled providers include fal, comfy, openai, and others; ClawHub image candidates exist but need vetting.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    area:runtimeOpenClaw runtime and Dockerarea:skillsGentle-AI/OpenClaw skillsenhancementNew feature or requestpriority:p1Important but not immediately blockingrisk:mediumMedium risk or dependency uncertaintysize:MReview size <=600 changed linesstatus:needs-reviewNeeds maintainer review before implementationtype:featureFeature work

    Projects

    No projects

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions