Changed formatting of tooltips for numeric types

[3fbaea00]

Problem

Poorly designed tooltips for constants of numeric type.

1. No need for an octal number system.
2. Formatting negative numbers with sign preservation makes no sense.
3. Hex representation for non-integer numbers is of poor use, instead a byte-array representation with fixed length, 4 bytes for float and 8 bytes for double is suggested.

Proposal

[ElektroKill]

Hey,

I agree with points 1 and 2, but I think we should keep the underscores for base 2.

As for point number 3, I prefer the existing way of formatting, using a hexadecimal number to represent the raw data of the floating-point number. I think it's easier to read, especially due to the grouping.

[3fbaea00]

Regarding point number 3, does it mean that I should add a second Raw representation, or should I just revert it to the 0xXXXX_XXXX_XXXX_XXX format?

[ElektroKill]

Regarding point number 3, does it mean that I should add a second Raw representation, or should I just revert it to the 0xXXXX_XXXX_XXXX_XXX format?

Please revert it to the 0xXXXX_XXXX representation. Also, for base16, please bring back the grouping of 4 and underscore separators. I think they make it easier to read really long numbers like ulong.