Repository navigation
chore(deps): Update ubi-minimal base image (main) - #3570
Conversation
Old digest: sha256:7fbeae18dc9476399f565e68255f602a3374ea8614ba3d14843565131a13ff93 New digest: sha256:e5161a7d7d99cf22e4f34b72e111211a399d956d9b0e8714da18e9c4c8151041 RPM changes: - coreutils-single-8.32-41.el9_8.x86_64 + coreutils-single-8.32-41.el9_8.1.x86_64 - glib2-2.68.4-19.el9_8.9.x86_64 + glib2-2.68.4-19.el9_8.10.x86_64 - openssl-libs-3.5.5-6.el9_8.x86_64 + openssl-libs-3.5.8-1.el9_8.x86_64
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 12 included reviews per hour; 11 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe production, distribution, and Kubernetes acceptance Dockerfiles now use updated pinned UBI minimal image digests. No other Dockerfile behavior changed. ChangesContainer image updates
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Change: Other Suggested reviewers: Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to The change only updates pinned base-image digests, with no reported behavior changes. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
Code Review by Qodo🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)
Great, no issues found!Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require reviewTip of the day💡 Did you know, you can reply 'qodo' on any finding to push back, ask questions, or dig deeper |
PR Summary by QodoUpdate UBI Minimal Base Image Digest
AI Description
Diagram
High-Level Assessment
Files changed (3)
|
|
🤖 Finished Review · ✅ Success · Started 3:39 PM UTC · Completed 3:45 PM UTC Commit: Runtime: claude · Model: opus → claude-opus-4-7 · Effort: high · Cost: $1.92 |
ReviewThis PR bumps the The change modifies files under a protected path ( FindingsHigh
Next steps:
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
LGTM |
|
🤖 Finished Retro · ✅ Success · Started 7:13 PM UTC · Completed 7:18 PM UTC Commit: Runtime: claude · Model: opus → claude-opus-4-7 · Effort: high · Cost: $2.85 |
|
PR #3570 is a routine, human-authored ubi-minimal base image digest bump (3 files, 6 lines) that Renovate would normally handle. The fullsend review agent issued CHANGES_REQUESTED with a single High No new proposal filed — this scenario is heavily duplicative. The pattern (bot-shaped Dockerfile digest bump flagged
New retro evidence worth attaching to those threads: on run 34989736469 the agent did read renovate.json and did label the diff as mechanical, so the reconciliation machinery was one sub-agent finding away from working — an argument for making 6e-1 proactively query the Renovate/Dependabot manifest rather than waiting for a volunteer finding (relevant to #4387/#3239). Also: |
Update ubi-minimal base image to latest digest.
Old digest:
sha256:7fbeae18dc9476399f565e68255f602a3374ea8614ba3d14843565131a13ff93New digest:
sha256:e5161a7d7d99cf22e4f34b72e111211a399d956d9b0e8714da18e9c4c8151041RPM changes
Ref: https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/EC-2184
Ref: https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/EC-2207