[FIX] connector_pms_wubook: keep per-room occupancy on same-type multi-room Booking reservations

[DarioLodeiros]

Problem

A Booking.com reservation that books several rooms of the same room type was imported with the wrong number of guests: every room ended up with the lowest per-room guest count. For example, a booking of two rooms — one for 1 adult and one for 2 adults — was imported as 1 adult in both rooms.

Root cause

In _reorg_folio_data (connector_pms_wubook/models/pms_folio/adapter.py) the per-room occupancy/children are stored in dicts keyed by room_id. When several booked_rooms share the same room_id (rooms of the same room type), those dicts collapse to a single entry and the per-room counts are lost. For Booking.com the code then ran occupancies_d[room_id] = min(occupancies_d[room_id], guests_adults) while iterating each room, so the single shared entry ended at the minimum across all rooms.

Fix

Booking.com already returns the authoritative per-room guest counts in each booked_room's ancillary (guests_adults / guests_children). Read them directly into per-room local variables instead of the room_id-keyed dict. The change is confined to the id_channel == 2 (Booking.com) branch, so every other channel keeps the previous behaviour.

Tests

Adds a regression test (TestPmsFolioOccupancy.test_reorg_multiroom_same_type_keeps_per_room_occupancy) covering a two-room, same-room-type Booking reservation with 1 and 2 adults, asserting each reservation (and its lines) keeps its own occupancy and children.

Notes

The underlying room_id-keyed collapse can in principle affect any channel that books multiple rooms of the same type with different occupancy, but only Booking.com provides per-room data to reconstruct it; other channels are intentionally left unchanged.

[github-actions]

Diff Coverage

Diff: origin/16.0...HEAD, staged and unstaged changes

• connector_pms_wubook/models/pms_folio/adapter.py (0.0%): Missing lines 281-282,294,297

Summary

• Total: 4 lines
• Missing: 4 lines
• Coverage: 0%

connector_pms_wubook/models/pms_folio/adapter.py

Lines 277-286

  277                 # type they share room_id, so these dicts collapse to a single
  278                 # entry and can no longer hold per-room guest counts. The
  279                 # Booking.com branch below overrides them with the authoritative
  280                 # per-room ancillary data.
! 281                 occupancy = occupancies_d.get(room_id)
! 282                 children = occupancies_d_children.get(room_id)
  283                 if id_channel == 2:  # Booking.com
  284                     # Board services can be included in the rate
  285                     # plan and detected by the WuBook API
  286                     detected_board = value.get("ancillary", {}).get("Detected Board")

---

Lines 290-301

  290                     # room_id-keyed dict, which collapses rooms of the same type
  291                     # (e.g. 2 rooms with 1 and 2 adults would both end up as 1).
  292                     guests_adults = room.get("ancillary", {}).get("guests_adults")
  293                     if guests_adults:
! 294                         occupancy = guests_adults
  295                     guests_children = room.get("ancillary", {}).get("guests_children")
  296                     if guests_children:
! 297                         children = guests_children
  298                 if id_channel == 43:  # AirBnb
  299                     # Add commission in price
  300                     self.apply_gross_prices_airbnb(
  301                         room=room,

---