Skip to content

MOD-9881 Track shared SVS thread pool memory & expose it through public API#967

Open
meiravgri wants to merge 7 commits into
mainfrom
meiravg_svs_thpool_alloactor
Open

MOD-9881 Track shared SVS thread pool memory & expose it through public API#967
meiravgri wants to merge 7 commits into
mainfrom
meiravg_svs_thpool_alloactor

Conversation

@meiravgri
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@meiravgri meiravgri commented May 11, 2026

The shared VecSimSVSThreadPool singleton was previously created via raw new with the default allocator, so its slot vector and per-slot ThreadSlot objects bypassed VecSimAllocator and were invisible to any memory accounting downstream (FT.INFO, INFO MODULES, etc.).

This PR:

  1. Routes the shared SVS thread pool's allocations through a dedicated VecSimAllocator (using VecsimSTLAllocator for the slot vector and std::allocate_shared for thread objects).
  2. Adds a new public API size_t VecSim_GetGlobalMemory(void) returning the total bytes of process-wide VecSim allocations not tied to any single index — today equal to the shared SVS thread pool's tracked allocation size.
  3. Surfaces these bytes in VECSIM_INFO via two new fields:
    • GLOBAL_MEMORY — appended at the top level of every algorithm's debug response by the C API wrapper VecSimIndex_DebugInfoIterator. Always present (value may be 0).
    • SHARED_SVS_THREADPOOL_MEMORY — appended at the end of any SVS algorithm section by SVSIndex::debugInfoIterator(). Present at the top level of a non-tiered SVS response, or inside BACKEND_INDEX of a tiered SVS response.

Public API change

Before

// (no API to query process-wide VecSim memory)

After

// Returns total bytes of process-wide VecSim allocations not tied to any single
// index (today: the shared SVS thread pool singleton). Returns 0 when no such
// global allocations exist.
size_t VecSim_GetGlobalMemory(void);

Callers (e.g. RediSearch) can fold this into per-spec or process-wide memory metrics without depending on which algorithm contributes.


VECSIM_INFO (FT.DEBUG) output change

Common header (every algorithm, unchanged)

ALGORITHM, TYPE, DIMENSION, METRIC, IS_MULTI_VALUE, IS_DISK,
INDEX_SIZE, INDEX_LABEL_COUNT, MEMORY, LAST_SEARCH_MODE

FLAT — 11 → 12 fields

  <common header × 10>
  BLOCK_SIZE
+ GLOBAL_MEMORY

HNSW — 18 → 19 fields

  <common header × 10>
  BLOCK_SIZE, M, EF_CONSTRUCTION, EF_RUNTIME, MAX_LEVEL, ENTRYPOINT,
  EPSILON, NUMBER_OF_MARKED_DELETED
+ GLOBAL_MEMORY

SVS (non-tiered) — 25 → 27 fields

  <common header × 10>
  BLOCK_SIZE, QUANT_BITS, ALPHA, GRAPH_MAX_DEGREE, CONSTRUCTION_WINDOW_SIZE,
  MAX_CANDIDATE_POOL_SIZE, PRUNE_TO, USE_SEARCH_HISTORY, NUM_THREADS,
  LAST_RESERVED_NUM_THREADS, NUMBER_OF_MARKED_DELETED, SEARCH_WINDOW_SIZE,
  SEARCH_BUFFER_CAPACITY, LEANVEC_DIMENSION, EPSILON
+ SHARED_SVS_THREADPOOL_MEMORY
+ GLOBAL_MEMORY

Tiered HNSW — 16 → 17 fields

  <common header × 10>           (ALGORITHM = "TIERED")
  MANAGEMENT_LAYER_MEMORY, BACKGROUND_INDEXING, TIERED_BUFFER_LIMIT
  FRONTEND_INDEX = nested [<FLAT fields, 11>]      (no GLOBAL_MEMORY in nested)
  BACKEND_INDEX  = nested [<HNSW fields, 18>]      (no GLOBAL_MEMORY in nested)
  TIERED_HNSW_SWAP_JOBS_THRESHOLD
+ GLOBAL_MEMORY

Tiered SVS — 17 → 18 fields

  <common header × 10>           (ALGORITHM = "TIERED")
  MANAGEMENT_LAYER_MEMORY, BACKGROUND_INDEXING, TIERED_BUFFER_LIMIT
  FRONTEND_INDEX = nested [<FLAT fields, 11>]
- BACKEND_INDEX  = nested [<SVS fields, 25>]
+ BACKEND_INDEX  = nested [<SVS fields, 26 — incl. SHARED_SVS_THREADPOOL_MEMORY>]
  TIERED_SVS_TRAINING_THRESHOLD, TIERED_SVS_UPDATE_THRESHOLD,
  TIERED_SVS_THREADS_RESERVE_TIMEOUT
+ GLOBAL_MEMORY

Two emission rules

  1. GLOBAL_MEMORY is appended exactly once, at the outermost iterator level, by the C API wrapper. Never appears inside a nested FRONTEND_INDEX/BACKEND_INDEX.
  2. SHARED_SVS_THREADPOOL_MEMORY is appended at the end of any SVS algorithm section by SVSIndex::debugInfoIterator(). So it shows up at the top level of a non-tiered SVS response, or inside BACKEND_INDEX of a tiered SVS response — never duplicated.

Stats / API output change

VecSim_GetGlobalMemory()

Before: API did not exist. The pool's slot vector and per-slot ThreadSlot objects went through the default allocator and were not tracked anywhere.

After:

size_t bytes = VecSim_GetGlobalMemory();
// == VecSimSVSThreadPool::getSharedAllocationSize()
//    (slot vector + per-slot ThreadSlot objects, allocated through the
//     dedicated VecSimAllocator).
// == 0 before any SVS index has been constructed and the worker pool size set.

Per-index getAllocationSize() (SVS only)

Before: Did not include any per-index portion of the parallelism slot, since the pool was untracked entirely.

After: Each SVS index's per-index allocator now tracks its own parallelism slot (a small fixed-size structure inside the index, allocated through the index's VecSimAllocator). The shared pool itself remains process-wide and reported via VecSim_GetGlobalMemory().

Cross-field invariant

Since the SVS thread pool is currently the only contributor to global memory:

VecSim_GetGlobalMemory() == VecSimSVSThreadPool::getSharedAllocationSize()
                         == <SHARED_SVS_THREADPOOL_MEMORY value in any SVS section>
                         == <GLOBAL_MEMORY value in any top-level VECSIM_INFO response>

This invariant is enforced by the new gtest SVSTest.debugInfoGlobalMemoryEqualsSharedSVSThreadPoolMemory. If a future contributor is added to VecSim_GetGlobalMemory() without updating breakdowns, the test will catch the drift.


Tests

  • Added SVSTest.debugInfoGlobalMemoryEqualsSharedSVSThreadPoolMemory — asserts both new fields exist exactly once in a non-tiered SVS response and report the same bytes as VecSim_GetGlobalMemory().
  • Updated compareFlatIndexInfoToIterator, compareHNSWIndexInfoToIterator, compareSVSIndexInfoToIterator to take an expect_global_memory parameter (default true) — needed because these comparators are called both with the C API iterator (top level, has GLOBAL_MEMORY) and as nested-backend comparators inside compareTieredIndexInfoToIterator (no GLOBAL_MEMORY).
  • Bumped expected field counts: SVS 25 → 26, TIERED_SVS updated accordingly. FLAT/HNSW/TIERED_HNSW field-count constants represent the C++ method count (no GLOBAL_MEMORY); the comparators add +1 when called with the C API iterator.
  • getSVSFields() / getTieredSVSFields() updated to reflect the new field positions.

Compatibility

  • Wire-compatible — adds new fields at well-defined positions in VECSIM_INFO. Existing consumers parsing by field name are unaffected; consumers indexing by position must shift their expectations accordingly (covered above).
  • Source-compatibleVecSim_GetGlobalMemory() is purely additive.
  • Behavioral parity — for callers that don't read the new fields/API, total tracked memory is now strictly larger by exactly the bytes the shared SVS thread pool was already consuming but not reporting.

Mark if applicable

  • This PR introduces API changes
  • This PR introduces serialization changes

Note

Medium Risk
Adds a new public API and changes VECSIM_INFO/debug iterator output field counts/order, which can affect downstream consumers that rely on positional parsing or memory accounting. Core search/indexing logic is unchanged, but the thread-pool allocation tracking and singleton initialization checks could impact stats reporting if incorrect.

Overview
Adds process-wide VecSim memory reporting by tracking allocations of the shared SVS thread pool through a dedicated VecSimAllocator and exposing it via new VecSim_GetGlobalMemory().

VecSimIndex_DebugInfoIterator now appends a top-level GLOBAL_MEMORY field for all algorithms, while SVS debug info adds SHARED_SVS_THREADPOOL_MEMORY to report the pool’s bytes (and adjusts iterator capacity/count expectations accordingly). SVS index construction and size estimation were updated to account for per-index VecSimSVSThreadPool parallelism allocation, and unit tests/utilities were updated to validate the new fields and revised field counts.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 31c0e0a. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@jit-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

jit-ci Bot commented May 11, 2026

🛡️ Jit Security Scan Results

CRITICAL HIGH MEDIUM

✅ No security findings were detected in this PR


Security scan by Jit

Comment thread src/VecSim/vec_sim.cpp Outdated
Comment thread tests/unit/unit_test_utils.cpp Outdated
Comment thread tests/unit/unit_test_utils.cpp Outdated
@meiravgri meiravgri changed the title use allocator for svs thpool MOD-9881 Track shared SVS thread pool memory & expose it through public API May 12, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

There are 2 total unresolved issues (including 1 from previous review).

Fix All in Cursor

❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, have a team admin enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 0ce994f. Configure here.

Comment thread src/VecSim/algorithms/svs/svs.h Outdated
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 12, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 95.65217% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 96.97%. Comparing base (d2563bf) to head (31c0e0a).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/VecSim/algorithms/svs/svs_utils.h 92.30% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #967      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.95%   96.97%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         130      130              
  Lines        7749     7829      +80     
==========================================
+ Hits         7513     7592      +79     
- Misses        236      237       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant