[mo-auto]

Auto-generated Cedarling cross-platform benchmark summary.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the benchmark report with measurements from the 2026-10-29 run, including mean latency, relative speed, and per-binding results.
  • Updated the report’s timestamp and workflow-run link.
  • The multi_issuer_sig_status scenario remains skipped; other listed scenarios remain marked as successful.

[claude]

Claude Code Review

This repository is configured for manual code reviews. Comment @claude review for a one-time review, or @claude review always to subscribe this PR to a review on every future push.

_{Tip: disable this comment in your organization's Code Review settings.}

[mo-auto]

✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status	Scan Engine	Critical	High	Medium	Low	Total (0)
✅	Open Source Security	0	0	0	0	0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.

Recent review info

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: Unavailable
• Branch: Unavailable
• File: No configuration file from this repository applied
• Commit: Unavailable
• Layers: Organization UI
• Review profile: ASSERTIVE
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 02e63a7c-d8f2-418c-9e1a-fd71f7f69dc5

Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5ba77c7 and a5a09cc.

Files selected for processing: 1

• docs/cedarling/reference/benchmarks.md

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 4 included reviews per hour; 3 remain after this review.

Walkthrough

The benchmark report now references the 2026-10-29 run and includes refreshed latency and relative-speed measurements. The multi_issuer_sig_status scenario remains marked as skipped.

Changes: Benchmark report

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Report provenance and measurements docs/cedarling/reference/benchmarks.md	The report timestamp and workflow-run link now reference the 2026-10-29 run. The mean-latency, relative-speed, and per-binding tables contain refreshed measurements; multi_issuer_sig_status remains skipped.

Priority: Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~4 minutes

Change: Other

Possibly related PRs

• JanssenProject/jans#15221: Updates the same Cedarling benchmark report with measurements from the October 12 run.

Suggested labels: comp-jans-cedarling

Suggested reviewers: moabu, haileyesus2433

Merge Risk: Minimal · up to a5a09

This documentation-only update is mergeable; no actionable implementation risk was identified.

Pre-merge checks: 4 · 1

Failed checks: 1 warning

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check		The description identifies the benchmark summary but does not follow the required template. It omits the target issue, implementation details, preparation confirmations, test and documentation checkli…	Update the pull request description with the required template sections. Add the target issue, implementation details, preparation confirmations, test and documentation checklist selections, and the required confirmation about documentation…

Passed checks: 4 passed

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check		The title clearly identifies the documentation change: updating the Cedarling benchmark summary.
Docstring Coverage		No eligible functions found in the changed files. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentat…
Linked Issues check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No eligible functions found in the changed files. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentation-only edits and deletions within surviving functions are included; unchanged diff context and fully deleted functions are excluded. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

Full details: Description check

Explanation

The description identifies the benchmark summary but does not follow the required template. It omits the target issue, implementation details, preparation confirmations, test and documentation checklist, and required documentation-change confirmation.

Resolution

Update the pull request description with the required template sections. Add the target issue, implementation details, preparation confirmations, test and documentation checklist selections, and the required confirmation about documentation impact. Ensure the relevant checklist items are selected before submission.

Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}