-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
fix(txn): make writes after a mid-scope commit atomic with the scope that owns them #2239
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b358449
fix(txn): make writes after a mid-scope commit atomic with the scope …
kriszyp 812f0bb
fix(txn): surrender ownership on a chained failure, keep the scope fl…
kriszyp ab8fbe7
fix(txn): route both rejection exits through endScopeOwnership, cover…
kriszyp 882380a
fix(txn): surrender ownership on a synchronous chained-commit throw too
kriszyp 0358191
test(txn): cover the synchronous chained throw, make the ambient test…
kriszyp File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggestion (non-blocking): the two large JSDoc blocks here (
A successful commit that is NOT the scope's final one...andFinish a commit: the chain goes with it...) describerotateAfterMidScopeCommitandcompleteMidScopeCommitrespectively, but both sit stacked aboveendScopeOwnershipinstead of above the methods they document (which are defined a few lines below). Only the last comment block (Both scope flags leave together...) is actually attached toendScopeOwnershipby JS/TS doc-comment convention, so an editor hoveringrotateAfterMidScopeCommit/completeMidScopeCommitwon't surface their reasoning at all. Move each block to sit directly above its own method.