Skip to content

docs: Gemini 3.8 Flash, corrected 3.6 Flash pricing, counts to 75/99 - #75

Merged
VickyXAI merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/gemini-3.8-flash
Sep 4, 2026
Merged

VickyXAI merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/gemini-3.8-flash

Conversation

@VickyXAI

@VickyXAI VickyXAI commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Companion to the gateway PR adding google/gemini-3.8-flash.

What changed

  • New model — google/gemini-3.8-flash at $0.75/$3.75 per 1M, 1M context, added to the model reference and the pricing sheet.
  • Corrected price — Gemini 3.6 Flash was published at $1.50/$7.50. Google put the whole 3.6/3.7/3.8 Flash band on a promotional rate through 2026-12-31 and the docs never followed, so the published price was ~2x the real one. Now $0.75/$3.75.
  • Counts — 74 → 75 chat, 98 → 99 total, across 21 files.

Both price changes are pinned by published-price-sync.test.ts in the gateway repo, and the counts by brand-numbers.docs.test.ts; both were red before this and are green after.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01LSAx2r1y79mm5W2Sh85pFD

…ounts to 75/99

Gemini 3.8 Flash is listed at $0.75/$3.75 per 1M (1M context), live-probed
direct against Google before listing.

Gemini 3.6 Flash was published at $1.50/$7.50 in both the pricing sheet and
the model reference. Google put the whole 3.6/3.7/3.8 Flash band on a
promotional rate through 2026-12-31 and the docs never followed, so the
published price was roughly twice the real one.

Model counts swept 74 -> 75 chat and 98 -> 99 total across 21 files.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LSAx2r1y79mm5W2Sh85pFD
@VickyXAI
VickyXAI merged commit 58e3dd7 into main Sep 4, 2026
1 check passed
@VickyXAI
VickyXAI deleted the docs/gemini-3.8-flash branch September 4, 2026 02:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant