Context
JiraPS was originally distributed under GPL and moved from GPLv2 to GPLv3 in commit e1239bd6 on 20 August 2016.
Commit d4352777 changed the repository license from GPLv3 to MIT on 5 October 2017. The public repository record does not contain a relicensing proposal, contributor consent, a CLA, or a copyright assignment covering that change. A search of the project owner's available email history also found no explicit license consent. The historical Slack archive is unavailable.
This issue collects a durable public record. It does not allege wrongdoing and does not by itself change the repository license.
Consent statement
Each affected contributor may approve the MIT licensing of their own pre-change contributions by posting the following statement as a comment:
I confirm that I authored contributions to JiraPS before 5 October 2017. I agree that those contributions may also be distributed under the MIT License used by the JiraPS project.
A contributor may instead identify exclusions or request clarification about the commits attributed to them.
Contributor inventory and consent status
The current-code audit is recorded in this comment and PR #708. Duplicate commit identities have been consolidated where apparent.
Surviving attribution
No surviving blame attribution
Required audit and resolution work
Completion criteria
This issue can close only when every surviving GPL-era contribution is covered by explicit MIT permission, independently replaced, or distributed under a GPL-compatible scope. Repository ownership, collaborator access, later contributions, and silence after the change are not treated as relicensing consent.
Related: #705
Context
JiraPS was originally distributed under GPL and moved from GPLv2 to GPLv3 in commit
e1239bd6on 20 August 2016.Commit
d4352777changed the repository license from GPLv3 to MIT on 5 October 2017. The public repository record does not contain a relicensing proposal, contributor consent, a CLA, or a copyright assignment covering that change. A search of the project owner's available email history also found no explicit license consent. The historical Slack archive is unavailable.This issue collects a durable public record. It does not allege wrongdoing and does not by itself change the repository license.
Consent statement
Each affected contributor may approve the MIT licensing of their own pre-change contributions by posting the following statement as a comment:
A contributor may instead identify exclusions or request clarification about the commits attributed to them.
Contributor inventory and consent status
The current-code audit is recorded in this comment and PR #708. Duplicate commit identities have been consolidated where apparent.
Surviving attribution
replicaJunction)jkknorr)axxelG)Dejulia489)LiamLeane)ebekker)padgers)brianbunke)beaudryj)No surviving blame attribution
Required audit and resolution work
LICENSING.md.Completion criteria
This issue can close only when every surviving GPL-era contribution is covered by explicit MIT permission, independently replaced, or distributed under a GPL-compatible scope. Repository ownership, collaborator access, later contributions, and silence after the change are not treated as relicensing consent.
Related: #705