Skip to content

docs(troubleshooting): add developer error troubleshooting and diagnosis playbook (#107) - #105

Closed
showmemercy19-rgb wants to merge 1 commit into
AstralDeep:mainfrom
showmemercy19-rgb:docs/add-developer-troubleshooting-playbook
Closed

showmemercy19-rgb wants to merge 1 commit into
AstralDeep:mainfrom
showmemercy19-rgb:docs/add-developer-troubleshooting-playbook

Conversation

@showmemercy19-rgb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adds developer troubleshooting playbook.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 5, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

All applicable PR CI workflows passed for 1e5b958.

Ready for maintainer code review.

@armstrongsam25 armstrongsam25 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for contributing. I reviewed the full diff against current main and the LETS constitution.

The complete troubleshooting playbook only names RequestConflictError and timeout cascades. It gives users no symptoms, diagnosis or safe resolution. Please document actual typed SDK/server error codes and recovery steps with source references, especially reusing the original request_id/content after a lost reply versus rejecting changed content, and expiry/cancellation behavior. Include concrete examples and avoid recommending retries that duplicate effects or widen authority.

Please expand this into complete, source-backed documentation before merge (constitution XI and XII). This head contains no measurable executable lines, so changed-line coverage is not applicable; that should be recorded explicitly in the PR. No tests or candidate code were executed during this review.

@armstrongsam25

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closing after source-based triage of head 1e5b958. The claimed troubleshooting playbook only names request conflicts and lease timeout cascades. It provides no symptoms, diagnostic steps, error mapping or safe resolution, so it adds no actionable troubleshooting outcome.

Evidence: actual typed error mapping; existing retry identity guidance; entire submitted playbook.

Triage criterion: unsupported-completion. Closing this unmerged PR does not close an unfulfilled task, delete the contributor branch, or award bounty points. A distinct substantive revision may be reviewed after reopening.

@armstrongsam25 armstrongsam25 added the triage:unsupported-completion Claimed completed scope is absent from the reviewed implementation or evidence. label Oct 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

triage:unsupported-completion Claimed completed scope is absent from the reviewed implementation or evidence.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants