I was following this amazing guide and when I started calibrating the K value for linear advance with the Pattern Method I started with values from 0 to 0.08 with direct drive as suggested on the Calibration Tool and most other guides but I realized all lines were almost exaclty the same so I started incrementing values slowly but still, nothing changed.
When I searched on the Marlin docs I found out that the K value was changed, as per this page), to range more from 0.1-2.0 which is far off from the starting suggested values.
Would it be possible to also show these values both on the guide and on the calibration tool itself on a small note as a more accurate starting point for Marling?
Thanks to everyone that has contributed to this guide! It has been an invaluable resource so far so thank you!
I was following this amazing guide and when I started calibrating the K value for linear advance with the Pattern Method I started with values from 0 to 0.08 with direct drive as suggested on the Calibration Tool and most other guides but I realized all lines were almost exaclty the same so I started incrementing values slowly but still, nothing changed.
When I searched on the Marlin docs I found out that the K value was changed, as per this page), to range more from 0.1-2.0 which is far off from the starting suggested values.
Would it be possible to also show these values both on the guide and on the calibration tool itself on a small note as a more accurate starting point for Marling?
Thanks to everyone that has contributed to this guide! It has been an invaluable resource so far so thank you!