Option to disable body errors display

Hi!
When I using param with format: regex there is nasty response returning with all that long regex.

For example:

      param :url, String, required: true,
                          format: URI::regexp,
                          message: "Valid url is required"

And the response:

=> {"message"=>"Valid url is required",
 "errors"=>
  {"url"=>
    "Parameter must match format (?x-mi:\n        ([a-zA-Z][\\-+.a-zA-Z\\d]*):                           (?# 1: scheme)\n        (?:\n           ((?:[\\-_.!~*'()a-zA-Z\\d;?:@&=+$,]|%[a-fA-F\\d]{2})(?:[\\-_.!~*'()a-zA-Z\\d;\\/?:@&=+$,\\[\\]]|%[a-fA-F\\d]{2})*)                    (?# 2: opaque)\n        |\n           (?:(?:\n             \\/\\/(?:\n                 (?:(?:((?:[\\-_.!~*'()a-zA-Z\\d;:&=+$,]|%[a-fA-F\\d]{2})*)@)?        (?# 3: userinfo)\n                   (?:((?:(?:[a-zA-Z0-9\\-.]|%\\h\\h)+|\\d{1,3}\\.\\d{1,3}\\.\\d{1,3}\\.\\d{1,3}|\\[(?:(?:[a-fA-F\\d]{1,4}:)*(?:[a-fA-F\\d]{1,4}|\\d{1,3}\\.\\d{1,3}\\.\\d{1,3}\\.\\d{1,3})|(?:(?:[a-fA-F\\d]{1,4}:)*[a-fA-F\\d]{1,4})?::(?:(?:[a-fA-F\\d]{1,4}:)*(?:[a-fA-F\\d]{1,4}|\\d{1,3}\\.\\d{1,3}\\.\\d{1,3}\\.\\d{1,3}))?)\\]))(?::(\\d*))?))? (?# 4: host, 5: port)\n               |\n                 ((?:[\\-_.!~*'()a-zA-Z\\d$,;:@&=+]|%[a-fA-F\\d]{2})+)                 (?# 6: registry)\n               )\n             |\n             (?!\\/\\/))                           (?# XXX: '\\/\\/' is the mark for hostport)\n             (\\/(?:[\\-_.!~*'()a-zA-Z\\d:@&=+$,]|%[a-fA-F\\d]{2})*(?:;(?:[\\-_.!~*'()a-zA-Z\\d:@&=+$,]|%[a-fA-F\\d]{2})*)*(?:\\/(?:[\\-_.!~*'()a-zA-Z\\d:@&=+$,]|%[a-fA-F\\d]{2})*(?:;(?:[\\-_.!~*'()a-zA-Z\\d:@&=+$,]|%[a-fA-F\\d]{2})*)*)*)?                    (?# 7: path)\n           )(?:\\?((?:[\\-_.!~*'()a-zA-Z\\d;\\/?:@&=+$,\\[\\]]|%[a-fA-F\\d]{2})*))?                 (?# 8: query)\n        )\n        (?:\\#((?:[\\-_.!~*'()a-zA-Z\\d;\\/?:@&=+$,\\[\\]]|%[a-fA-F\\d]{2})*))?                  (?# 9: fragment)\n      )"}}

It doesn't look good. Is there any way to disable errors showing in the response?