on CUDA exact_sstp_cond 3 times faster than the default? #326

Open

opened

Judging from the lgrngn_cond_substep tests, exact (per-particle) substepping is much faster than the old, per-cell substepping.
Why is it so? I expected the opposite.

to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

No labels

No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests