Replies: 6 comments 2 replies
|
I think these are great additions. I have added #1037 for compressibility. Please review. |
|
I do wonder for permeability, since the unit strings are the same as area, what do we do about parsing collisions? @angularsen |
|
Great, and thanks for the quick replies! One thing to note about permeability is that it is used for different quantities depending on the type of science involved. I see there's one already implemented for electromagnetism using "henry" as unit - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permeability_(electromagnetism) What's the best practice to differentiate between them in UnitsNet? One might be to use different suffixes, like PermeabilityElectromagnetism, PermeabilityFluidMechanics etc. |
|
For permeability (fluid mechanics) these units are used a lot in the oil & gas domain:
|
|
I can add those sure. I think FluidPermeability is concise if everyone agrees? |
|
That seems like a good compromise.
|
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi,
ref the https://github.com/angularsen/UnitsNet/wiki/Adding-a-New-Unit - as "is widely used" is a relative concept, I want to discuss whether quantities and units around
would be welcomed to the project?
It is highly used in several domains, like petroleum.
Best regards,
Frank
All reactions